Move funding from the lowest-performing quintile (fifth) to the highest-performing quintile.
Track the cost, speed, and long-term success of programs that result in homeless people getting housed, either directly or by increasing income so that they can return to self-sufficiency.
Those programs in the bottom 20% of ratings in any of those categories should be retooled or eliminated. Their funding should go to those programs which are in the top 20% in ALL of those categories.
Program comparisons may need to be kept within certain parameters so that "like" is compared with "like" (apples with apples, not oranges).
14
votes
N J Sherman
shared this idea